Doctorossi 10:17 AM 01-31-2012
Originally Posted by RevSmoke:
There are certain smokes in 60RG that are wonderful, others not so much.
:-)
This will be a "wait and see" for me.
[Reply]
BlindedByScience 12:30 PM 01-31-2012
shilala 01:22 PM 01-31-2012
The SI-15's were awesome, and continue to get better. I managed to gather up a pretty nice pile to tuck away.
I'm glad they're tweaking the blend away from the SI-15 blend, I'm hoping it'll be a more standard 1964 profile, not that the SI-15 wasn't excellent.
"Padrón has made a 6 by 60 Anniversary before, but it was a special release for a retail shop. Jorge Padrón said this cigar would have a different blend and different taste."
I'm with you guys, I'd go apesh1t over a 1964 maddie lancero or a 1926 maddie lancero. Even the nats would be phenomenal, not that I'd bother with them.
:-)
[Reply]
lenguamor 01:25 PM 01-31-2012
I have a thought on the trend toward 60RG-and-larger cigars, but one of my new year's resolutions is to less abrasive...so I won't.
[Reply]
Jbailey 01:45 PM 01-31-2012
I had to double check to make sure that it wasn't April 1st.
I still enjoy a padron anni now and again but I doubt I would grab a 60rg one.
[Reply]
ucla695 02:16 PM 01-31-2012
icehog3 02:28 PM 01-31-2012
Originally Posted by ucla695:
I'm holding out for the 64RG. :-)
You and Bozo.
:-)
Originally Posted by icehog3:
We're waiting for the 70 RGs! Hehhawhehahwhaw!!
Image
:-) :-)
[Reply]
ucla695 02:30 PM 01-31-2012
Originally Posted by icehog3:
You and Bozo. :-)
:-) Missed that one!
:-)
[Reply]
lenguamor 04:04 PM 01-31-2012
Laugh, Tom, but on the tour Friday I saw a 7x70 at one of the manufacturers' places. It is experimental, but...very real.
[Reply]
Zeuceone 04:06 PM 01-31-2012
lenguamor 04:19 PM 01-31-2012
Image
I don't know who this pretty lady is, but she is about to smoke a Perdomo Immenso, a 6x70 regular-production cigar.
[Reply]
kuzi16 05:40 PM 01-31-2012
7 x 70? damn. makes my jaw hurt just thinking about it.
[Reply]
icehog3 05:56 PM 01-31-2012
Originally Posted by lenguamor:
Laugh, Tom, but on the tour Friday I saw a 7x70 at one of the manufacturers' places. It is experimental, but...very real.
Oh, the humanity.
[Reply]
ChicagoWhiteSox 06:08 PM 01-31-2012
Originally Posted by lenguamor:
Image
I don't know who this pretty lady is, but she is about to smoke a Perdomo Immenso, a 6x70 regular-production cigar.
Wow... This makes me
:-)
[Reply]
shilala 06:10 PM 01-31-2012
I hope they box press these new ones. Honestly, the SI-15's are stellar, even if they are ridiculously sized. I wish I had at least 20 more put up.
[Reply]
ApexAZ 07:06 PM 01-31-2012
Honestly haven't been overly impressed with Padron.
[Reply]
Emjaysmash 07:44 PM 01-31-2012
Originally Posted by ApexAZ:
Honestly haven't been overly impressed with Padron.
Good.
More for ME!
:-):-)
[Reply]
maninblack 07:59 PM 01-31-2012
Originally Posted by shilala:
The SI-15's were awesome, and continue to get better. I managed to gather up a pretty nice pile to tuck away.
I'm glad they're tweaking the blend away from the SI-15 blend, I'm hoping it'll be a more standard 1964 profile, not that the SI-15 wasn't excellent.
"Padrón has made a 6 by 60 Anniversary before, but it was a special release for a retail shop. Jorge Padrón said this cigar would have a different blend and different taste."
I'm with you guys, I'd go apesh1t over a 1964 maddie lancero or a 1926 maddie lancero. Even the nats would be phenomenal, not that I'd bother with them. :-)
So that's where they all went!
:-) I've been trying to find these for sometime now. Guess I need to make a roadtrip to your house Scott!
[Reply]
weak_link 08:28 PM 01-31-2012
I am no threat to your beloved jaw breakers. I'll be busy scooping up all the dainty little coronas, panatellas, and lanceros.
[Reply]
Zeuceone 08:29 PM 01-31-2012
Originally Posted by lenguamor:
[IMG]http://i129.photobucket.com/albums/p225/dirtyrottenbastard27/perdomoimmenso.jpg[IMG]
I don't know who this pretty lady is, but she is about to smoke a Perdomo Immenso, a 6x70 regular-production cigar.
Looks like shes done that's before.
[Reply]