md4958 08:50 AM 02-05-2010
elderboy02 08:54 AM 02-05-2010
This is why I don't understand art. $105 million? Seriously?
[Reply]
Mugen910 09:01 AM 02-05-2010
Oh C'mon...you don't see the minute details?
What about the skillfully hand crafted angles?
Better yet, the wonderful way the statue seems to represent everything about mankind?
No?
Me either.
:-)
[Reply]
kugie 09:04 AM 02-05-2010
Originally Posted by Mugen910:
Oh C'mon...you don't see the minute details?
What about the skillfully hand crafted angles?
Better yet, the wonderful way the statue seems to represent everything about mankind?
No?
Me either. :-)
:-) :-)
[Reply]
shilala 09:11 AM 02-05-2010
I could totally do that for like 10%.
[Reply]
mithrilG60 09:13 AM 02-05-2010
$105 million? Let me just pull that out of my back pocket. Door prize for the next herf anyone?
[Reply]
md4958 09:17 AM 02-05-2010
Originally Posted by shilala:
I could totally do that for like $10.
Fixed it for you Scotty
[Reply]
hotreds 09:19 AM 02-05-2010
Originally Posted by mithrilG60:
$105 million? Let me just pull that out of my back pocket. Door prize for the next herf anyone?
More like door stop for the next herf!
[Reply]
chippewastud79 09:28 AM 02-05-2010
Its 'life size', thus making it worth the money. Duh
:-)
[Reply]
wayner123 09:35 AM 02-05-2010
It's got to be some sort of investment and who knows? Maybe a museum did buy it.
But my problem comes in when critics say "an original pice of art". Have these same yuppies ever seen cave drawings? The same lines and designs were used thousands of years ago. So Giacometti's whole idea of "modern man" to me is shot out the window.
[Reply]
MedicCook 09:38 AM 02-05-2010
$105M? I would break it the first hour I had it home.
[Reply]
mithrilG60 09:44 AM 02-05-2010
Originally Posted by wayner123:
It's got to be some sort of investment and who knows? Maybe a museum did buy it.
Art is always an investment when you have the capital to play at the level this piece is apparently at. If the new owner wants to sell it in 5 years they're going to get at least the $105 million they paid for it so it's really just a means of storing your money in a medium that you find visually appealing.
The only debate is whether it's actually visually appealing. To my eyes it's not, but it's not my $105 million on the table so my opinion on it's aesthetics really doesn't mean much.
[Reply]
marge796 09:48 AM 02-05-2010
Not seeing it? Looks like something you'd see at a craft store in the accessory aisle.
IMHO
Chris.....
[Reply]
poker 10:14 AM 02-05-2010
chippewastud79 10:19 AM 02-05-2010
shilala 10:55 AM 02-05-2010
Originally Posted by MedicCook:
$105M? I would break it the first hour I had it home.
:-)
I'd definately have to fix it within an hour of it getting here if it didn't get broke on the trailer.
[Reply]
poker 11:05 AM 02-05-2010
Originally Posted by chippewastud79:
Not 'life size', not worth it. :-)
Yeah I know. But then again, how many people are that damn skinny anywho?
:-)
[Reply]
adampc22 11:09 AM 02-05-2010
well thats art for you look at the mona lisa thats just some ugly bird siting but thats still worth a few dollers 2
[Reply]
kaisersozei 11:36 AM 02-05-2010
"The sculpture by the 20th century Swiss artist, considered an iconic Giacometti work as well as one of the most recognizable images of modern art, was sold to an anonymous bidder by telephone, the auction house said."
Somebody was drunk dialing again.
And somebody's wife is gonna be
pissed.
[Reply]
adampc22 11:37 AM 02-05-2010
Originally Posted by kaisersozei:
"The sculpture by the 20th century Swiss artist, considered an iconic Giacometti work as well as one of the most recognizable images of modern art, was sold to an anonymous bidder by telephone, the auction house said."
Somebody was drunk dialing again.
And somebody's wife is gonna be pissed.
realllllllllllllll pissed
:-)
[Reply]