BC-Axeman 10:48 AM 03-18-2009
Jester, Jason, Justin, just...out.
[Reply]
Originally Posted by taltos:
Eagerly waiting for Peter's post mortem on this about how the two asshats were linked and how our crack team outed them.:-)
probably by IP addy
[Reply]
taltos 11:16 AM 03-18-2009
lightning9191 11:54 AM 03-18-2009
Originally Posted by Nabinger16:
Being rather new to the Asylum (it took me a bit to realize the flood waters weren't going away) I have to ask... Was this moron the first to get banned from the loony bin?
We should start a wall of shame
:-)
[Reply]
tunes 12:25 PM 03-18-2009
Originally Posted by lightning9191:
We should start a wall of shame :-)
As funny as that would be, it’s probably not the politically correct thing to do.
:-):-):-) I can see it now; we could play games like pin the tail on the avatar…
[Reply]
piperman 12:37 PM 03-18-2009
Originally Posted by loki:
probably by IP addy
Allot of people don't understand that modems IP are the ones people see, they think they can just move to the kids computer and they will be on a different IP.
[Reply]
s15driftking 01:17 PM 03-18-2009
Originally Posted by icehog3:
I am more concerned with function than with fashion
fixed!
form is an offshoot of function!
:-):-):-)
[Reply]
SilverFox 01:32 PM 03-18-2009
Originally Posted by s15driftking:
fixed!
form is an offshoot of function!:-):-):-)
Nope
Function over Form is correct
Function being the action for which athing is specially fitted or used or for which a thing exists
Form being the shape and structure of something as distinguished from its material
Hence I believe the douchebag was correct in his usage of the term.
But WTF do I know
:-)
[Reply]
beamish 01:38 PM 03-18-2009
how well it works is far more important than looks,and I dont think its ugly especially the burl
[Reply]
chippewastud79 01:39 PM 03-18-2009
Originally Posted by SilverFox:
Nope
Function over Form is correct
Function being the action for which athing is specially fitted or used or for which a thing exists
Form being the shape and structure of something as distinguished from its material
Hence I believe the douchebag was correct in his usage of the term.
But WTF do I know :-)
:-) Very nice explanation Shawn
:-)
[Reply]
s15driftking 02:42 PM 03-18-2009
Originally Posted by SilverFox:
Nope
Function over Form is correct
Function being the action for which athing is specially fitted or used or for which a thing exists
Form being the shape and structure of something as distinguished from its material
Hence I believe the douchebag was correct in his usage of the term.
But WTF do I know :-)
^^ what he said... i guess???
:-):-) :-)
[Reply]
BC-Axeman 03:06 PM 03-18-2009
Originally Posted by SilverFox:
Nope
Function over Form is correct
Function being the action for which athing is specially fitted or used or for which a thing exists
Form being the shape and structure of something as distinguished from its material
Hence I believe the douchebag was correct in his usage of the term.
But WTF do I know :-)
But the raw plastic, burl, silver and even gold plated platinum may have identical form.
[Reply]
SeanGAR 03:18 PM 03-18-2009
Originally Posted by BC-Axeman:
But the raw plastic, burl, silver and even gold plated platinum may have identical form.
Yes, but their functions are different. My neighbor Ari is a mohel. I gave Ari my gold one to do his business since he was so enamored with it one evening when he was over.
My silver one is for Thursdays.
My burl one is for ... well ... those special moments when I'm driving my Plymouth K-car wagon with authentic genuine fake wood trim.
Image
OK ... I lied.
My neighbor's name is David.
[Reply]
icehog3 05:39 PM 03-18-2009
Originally Posted by loki:
probably by IP addy
It was a lot more complex than that, but I won't steal any of the true detectives' thunder.
:-)
[Reply]
WildBlueSooner 06:28 PM 03-18-2009
I prefer form over function....just meet my wife! BAM! Just kidding...dont tell her I said that!
[Reply]
14holestogie 06:30 PM 03-18-2009
Originally Posted by WildBlueSooner:
I prefer form over function....just meet my wife! BAM! Just kidding...dont tell her I said that!
Like you say, you win some, you lose some.
:-)
[Reply]
pnoon 06:40 PM 03-18-2009
Originally Posted by taltos:
Eagerly waiting for Peter's post mortem on this about how the two asshats were linked and how our crack team outed them.:-)
There is never an easy answer.
Originally Posted by loki:
probably by IP addy
Of course, this is how the two were originally flagged.
Originally Posted by icehog3:
It was a lot more complex than that, but I won't steal any of the true detectives' thunder. :-)
No thunder to steal, Tom.
This was a team effort. The Team of 11 is truly a team.
Although, I had the dubious task of being on the front line and dealing with this juvenile phucktard via PM. Lots of lies and evasive answers. Not a surprise given how this thread evolved. Other members of the Team of 11 found issues and falsehoods in other forums linking these two together. Eventually, he caved in and admitted he was using both accounts.
Buh-bye and good riddance to both.
[Reply]
taltos 06:43 PM 03-18-2009
BamBam 07:06 PM 03-18-2009
Originally Posted by pnoon:
dealing with this juvenile phucktard
:-):-)
I have always been curious is there a way to block his IP so he can't just join again.
[Reply]
pnoon 07:37 PM 03-18-2009
Originally Posted by BamBam:
:-):-)
I have always been curious is there a way to block his IP so he can't just join again.
Way ahead of you, Dustin.
Already done.
[Reply]