Most people over here have more them him, I think it should be done.

So did I.

I also watched another thread disappear right before my eyes. Someone posted inquiring as to if this was still the home of the lowland gorillas. I did a quick refresh to see if anybody might respond and, -poof- it was gone.

Probably falls under "Drama" on page 42 of "leadership by delusion - my way is best for me". :-)

Better not if you want to still be able to log on. You'd be a target.

is that it? I was thinking it was like ten percent of your score

what you're saying makes more sense...

well, it'll just take more of us :-)

Of course, there is one.... One member that would send him absolutely plummeting, but I won't mention his name out of respect for the turmoil he caused.

A quick look at the members list sorted by Reputation will show you the answer.

Mod suicide there. :-) Maybe Kevin G is up for it. :-)

Its true. You can tweek vb to have RG/rep/fins/whatever to any random number you like if you are an admin.
He can also place any threads or rooms in or out of sight. They're still there, just not visable to the general population.

To be honest, its not worth my time or effort to go and ding him. Chances are the whole RG thing may just disappear anyways very soon there.

I see, MR L

then we must act quickly :-)

It'd be a little poetic eh?

He said PDS deleted it.

I'll call a negative on the mass ding-age gents.

It wouldn't be OUR way :-)

I know I know... it just fun to imagine it...

I would love a screen shot of him with massive negative ring gauge, just for kicks :-)

I agree with Dustin. He'd like the attention.
I think a far better way to help out would be to see to it that all our buds are invited over here.
Tumbleweeds would get his attention more than torment.

LOL and then of course in douchebag fashion, immediately closed the thread.

You are much more gracious than I would be after he just closed that thread!!!

I disagree, Dustin. sort of.
RG dings are not a CA statement but an individual's statement. Each person who is a member there can decide for themselves.

For me, it's not worth the headache.

JC is a pathological liar and to make snide comments after being told how to find out what happened to rjs' thread, he claims that Paul hard deleted the thread. While certainly possible, I would be very surprised that Paul did so.

I invited the majority of the pipe forum not too long ago, most are here now :-)

I kind of hope Paul did delete RJS' thread. It seems fitting that Paul should decide the fate of that thread considering their history together. Do you think that thread belongs over there at all?

I'd be surprised too. I PM'd Paul asking if he saved a copy before getting rid of it. Fingers are crossed.