Darren, you contend it is unfair to penalize Tom Brady because he is Tom Brady and a Patriot. OK. Does it not logically follow that it is equally unfair to coddle Tom Brady because he is Tom Brady and a Patriot?
[Reply]

:-) Bingo.
He is handsome, rich, talented, has won Super Bowls, has a Super Model wife so you love him.
He is handsome, rich, talented, has won Super Bowls, has a Super Model wife so you hate him.

Chit happens.:-)

Someone commented on Bradshaw earlier. Seriously, who can hate him.? Guy is a nut job and a pisser. He lacks handsome and Super Model wife and therefore is only rich, talented and has won Super Bowls so therefore must be loved.
[Reply]

Then what's all this talk about Asylum math, then?
[Reply]

Ho-lee crap. If you listen close enough, one can almost hear the construction of Brady's cross. You'll have to concentrate though, as Darren's indignation almost drowns it out. Almost. :-)
[Reply]

4 Games? I must of missed where he punched the footballs in an elevator or beat it with a stick.:-):-)
[Reply]

4 Games for Brady
loss of 2016 first round pick
loss of 2017 fourth round pic
and $1,000,000 fine

(all of this before any appeals)
[Reply]

My entire family is from New England, straight from Europe, so don't know about that 'we" part. :-)

Image

(I just wanted an excuse to use that) :-)
[Reply]

https://video.search.yahoo.com/video...t=mozilla&tt=b
[Reply]

Well done sir.:-)
[Reply]

I am hoping appeal reduces it to 3 games, $950,000 and expulsion of the Patriots from the NFL.

Lighten up, Fanboys, I keed, I keed.
[Reply]

:-)
[Reply]

That would defy logic; I stated no such thing. I stated that it was unjust to convict ANYONE based on ambiguities.

This is what I wrote:

"Ya know, I don't really watch football much but injustice bothers me, a lot. I would hate to be subject to punishment of any kind based on something as flimsy as "probably" or "generally". We're taking about possibly many thousands of dollars in fines. If you're going to reach into someone's pocket, it is monstrously unjust to do it without actual proof, otherwise it's just robbery."
[Reply]

I should have stipulated Boston.
[Reply]

It is not I who is in the crucifixion business; you seem to have that well covered already.
[Reply]

Seems some of the "discussion" is getting a bit personal.

I don't like closing threads. But I will if it doesn't remain civil.

:-)
[Reply]

As we are being civil here, Darren, I will assume you edited your quoted post by mere happenstance. :-)
[Reply]

I don't know what you mean by "edited". Are you talking about the comma? Please demonstrate where I wrote that:
"...it is unfair to penalize Tom Brady because he is Tom Brady and a Patriot."
[Reply]

:-):-):-)
[Reply]

Ray Rice?
[Reply]

I tried to be nice and let it slide, but if you really insist on :-)


[Reply]