Originally Posted by mithrilG60:
I think it's multiple things, the primary one being that BoB was based on a single book that had taken many different individual experiences and used them to create a single cohesive storyline with a standardized narration style because it's written by a single author. The Pacific is based on 2 primary works written by very different men with different viewpoints and opinions, and that naturally leads to the story line being more disjointed than BoB. Both those works were also personal memoires written more as exercises in self-catharsis than as the historical essays/analysis which BoB was intended to be before HBO turned it into the mini-series.
Ultimately The Pacific is a very different mini-series that BoB, but that's fitting considering the PTO was a very different war and experience than the ETO.
I agree with this. I don't think
The Pacific was as good as
BoB simply because of the source material. As much as I wanted to enjoy
The Pacific, I just found myself not caring for the characters in the way that I did in
BoB.
[Reply]