wanna freak the hell out of some people, do this - Page 3

Originally Posted by uncballzer:
question, why the hell would they call the cops for having a helmet on?

I believe it violates some federal law that went into effect after 911 (maybe).
[Reply]

Same reason you cant forget to take your ski mask off on a really cold day :-)
[Reply]

Originally Posted by ggainey:
I believe it violates some federal law that went into effect after 911 (maybe).

Image
[Reply]

:-):-):-) Thanks for sharing.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by SmokeyJoe:
Now THAT made me laugh. :-)

:-) don't encourage me
[Reply]

Originally Posted by TXRebel:
Sounds like a violation of the 4Th Amendment.

Not if Brad gave consent. :-)
[Reply]

Brad, why did you give consent
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Big Vito:
Brad, why did you give consent

I don't know if he did, I am just saying there is no violation if he did.
[Reply]

I would venture to say he did my guess is most people do.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by Big Vito:
I would venture to say he did my guess is most people do.

Never assume anything, Perry, because when you do you make an ass....ah, you know the rest. :-)
[Reply]

Originally Posted by darb85:
it wasnt a big deal. I mean I would have done the same probably. bonehead move on my part.

actually it is a big deal, I'm sorry you can't see that
[Reply]

Originally Posted by icehog3:
I don't know if he did, I am just saying there is no violation if he did.

Which I did, I dont know, was a bit freaked out, and whatever, ive got nothing to hide. I guess its a bigger deal than i thought.
[Reply]

it's remarkable how history repeats itself.

Nature.. weeds...
My mom has an issue with what we like to call "situational reality."
And remember kids, you don't have to pass a test to be a parent, either!
Going to the State fair reminds me of the diverse nature of our society as well.
Image

Sorry, I got distracted...

Loook!! OOOOHHHH SHINY!
[Reply]

Originally Posted by icehog3:
Not if Brad gave consent. :-)

Originally Posted by darb85:
Which I did, I dont know, was a bit freaked out, and whatever, ive got nothing to hide. I guess its a bigger deal than i thought.

There was probably a little coercion. :-)
[Reply]

He gave consent because he was likely still shaken up by the whole ordeal and wanted to be released and he knew that he had nothing to hide. While they were searching your house and bags, they were looking for anything that they could bust you with (eg drugs, guns, etc.). Since they had wrongly detained you, they were reaching for any reason to lock your butt up, so that they could feel justified about man handling you and hauling you to the station.
[Reply]

I will remain silent :-)
[Reply]

I don't think I would have let them look in my house, there was no justification to do that.
[Reply]

Originally Posted by TXRebel:
There was probably a little coercion. :-)

Originally Posted by ade06:
He gave consent because he was likely still shaken up by the whole ordeal and wanted to be released and he knew that he had nothing to hide. While they were searching your house and bags, they were looking for anything that they could bust you with (eg drugs, guns, etc.). Since they had wrongly detained you, they were reaching for any reason to lock your butt up, so that they could feel justified about man handling you and hauling you to the station.

Wow, a lot of assumptions here for people who weren't there.

Ade, you make it sound like fact...hope Brad filled in those details for you and you didn't just come up with that as factual on your own. :-)
[Reply]

Well, if a cop wanted to look in my house I'd normally just invite them in for tea.

Now, if they wanted a peek down my pants, they'd have to buy me a beer first.
[Reply]