+5
[Reply]

And here we are, and still there be no resolution, arg.
Bump-tiddy-bump.
[Reply]

brewhahaha, tis' a coming... eventually :-)
[Reply]

Someone start a box split.
:-)
[Reply]

+6 :-)
[Reply]

Opennnnnnnnnnnnnn it...
[Reply]

April fools.
[Reply]

Image
[Reply]

Time for a bump. Any further developments?
[Reply]

Still on the backburner :-)

Working it's way up there however.. I'm guessing it will arrive at the top within the next month or two.
[Reply]

I too would be interested in rhe group buy.
[Reply]

Frankly I am shocked that it has been less than a year since this was first posted. It seems like three years to me.
[Reply]

:-)
[Reply]

Can't wait to see how this turns out. It would be awesome to have one of those bottles.
[Reply]

why is it not open already. been waiting on this for a while.
[Reply]

Still waiting...
[Reply]

FYI - once whisk(e)y is bottled, the aging process stops, so this should (depending on storage conditions) taste the same as it did when it was bottled. Still a unique item, but not aged those 30+ years since bottled.
[Reply]

Exactly :-)
[Reply]

Almost 3.5 years later ..... what became of this whisky?
[Reply]

Interesting answer I received from an old family friend that retired from Jack Daniels. Said they used to label crates that way as well. The 64 for JD would be the year distilled. 86 the year bottled and the 232 the cask # or batch number if its a blended instead of single barrel. He did say JD stopped using wood crates prior to 86 and he thought most everyone in the industry did the same prior to then as well. So he finds it curios how I described this to him. He retired around 1990 and is almost as old as dirt so his memory may be off a little. I agree though what happened to this great find?
[Reply]