You speak as though these are unique to the South. Texas, Notre Dame and Ohio St. all have way more money at their disposal than any SEC school and I'd wager that none have as big a following as Notre Dame. Yet until last year Notre Dame had not so much as a bowl victory in over 15 years. I doubt it's because the fans didn't care.
Nowhere did I mitigate fan support. But you could hope, wish, root and pray your little heart out for your team to do well, but if they don't have the coaching and players, it's a moot point. Is it a symbiotic relationship? Sure. Universities need money from fans to hire decent coaches, have nice stadiums and equipment to help recruit top players, etc. But at the end of the day, it's arrogance to think that the SEC is on it's current run because they have better fans. So, to use your logic, the previous three decades (70's, 80's and 90's) the Big 10, Pac-10, BigXIII/BigXII just had better fans than the SEC, that's why they won the vast majority of the National Titles during that span?
And yet, they're not propelled to greatness without those coaches (and the talent that follows coaches), as fervent as the fanbase may be. It's an insult to fanbases around the country to somehow think that one of the main reasons the SEC has won the last five (soon to be six) BCS Championships is because you're better fans. It flies in the face of obvious recruiting advantages the South has and gives credence where it's not due.:-)
[Reply]

You just wanted to make sure I understood.:-)
[Reply]

Meant Big VIII/Big XII, but I'm sure you guys knew that.
[Reply]

And the hits just keep comin': Charlie Weis takes the head coaching job of Kansas.

I never like that cheeseburger eatin' b@stard anyhow
[Reply]

Good Riddance, Huh, Michael? :-)
[Reply]

I was reasonably shocked to hear that, mostly the good kind of shock because I looked at the
way he coached the Fla team this year and I was thinking, man, he either IGNORES the QB standing
next to him, NEVER talks to him, or he sits on the bench the whole game and doesn't watch and ignores
the QBs. I am thinking, 'they must be paying him in cheeseburgers' because he sure doesn't seem very
involved or doesn't have any desire to participate. I felt so sorry for the UF fans. COULDN'T be happier.
[Reply]

Erhuh..LSU's THE BEST, cough ehem, er....Merry Christmas and a sad new year to all my Bama friends.
[Reply]

Not too late to switch! Join members of the national sports media who are coming over to our side in droves.
[Reply]

Roll Tide!
[Reply]

:-)
[Reply]

Breaking News: A winning season means male students are more likely to party and have their grades suffer! :-) I'm shocked

http://www.gainesville.com/article/2...9959?p=1&tc=pg

I'd like to see this study done at a real football powerhouse in the SEC :-)
[Reply]

Oh my god, say it isn't so....YOU have gone over to the darkest dark side?
[Reply]

2012 SEC schedules just released:

http://www.secdigitalnetwork.com/NEW...-schedule.aspx
[Reply]

Before looking I think I remember that LSU, whom I touted as playing anyone nationwide with a sack,
has a pretty weak non-conference schedule in 2012. Spoke to soon, OR hello two straight national
championships, lol. Why is everybody playing Texas A&M??? Did I miss something???


ROFL
[Reply]

Did you miss the addition of Texas A&M and Missouri into the SEC?
[Reply]

Cannot wait to watch A&M get destroyed next year. Trial by fire....
[Reply]

Georgia looks to have quite the cupcake schedule next year
[Reply]

They will still lose to Carolina I believe.
[Reply]

Mike the Tiger still has a smile on his face, so Brad hasn't come up for air yet.
[Reply]

It appears Stanford caught the 'Bama syndrome and couldn't make a FG. On second thought, Oklahoma State displayed superior depth and balance :-) :-) :-)
[Reply]