The Poet 11:43 AM 06-24-2016
The Poet 12:05 PM 06-24-2016
BTW, 1957 Century was just my first (apparently wrong) guess, as all I could judge from the photo was mid-'50s Buick of some model.
[Reply]
The Poet 02:03 PM 06-24-2016
Headlights look right, but we need a slightly better look at the taillights to confirm.
:-)
[Reply]
Originally Posted by The Poet:
Headlights look right, but we need a slightly better look at the taillights to confirm. :-)
I won't argue with that logic.
:-)
[Reply]
TXRebel 03:40 PM 06-24-2016
Originally Posted by The Poet:
Headlights look right, but we need a slightly better look at the taillights to confirm. :-)
'55 and '56 had different grilles, it's a '55.
:-)
[Reply]
The Poet 04:31 PM 06-24-2016
Originally Posted by TXRebel:
'55 and '56 had different grilles, it's a '55. :-)
Thanks, but in the ORIGINAL photo by Ron, post #4276, and the pic that started all this discussion, we cannot see the grill . . . only part of the front bumper.
You can blame Ron for posting an untitled picture, but I prefer you blame me for asking what it was.
:-)
[Reply]
shark 05:55 PM 06-24-2016
Pretty innovative for the time, with front wheel drive! Olds Toronado
Image
[Reply]
shark 06:03 PM 06-24-2016
1955 Studebaker. I like their rather unusual styling, for the most part:
Image
[Reply]
shark 06:06 PM 06-24-2016
shark 06:11 PM 06-24-2016
shark 12:25 PM 07-10-2016
shark 03:10 PM 07-17-2016
shark 03:11 PM 07-17-2016
shark 03:13 PM 07-17-2016
shark 03:15 PM 07-17-2016
Originally Posted by shark:
Image
Great shot Ron! This one really jumped out at me since I started keeping bees this year. This is a great pic but for those interested, that is not a honeybee. It's a hover fly.
[Reply]
swingerofbirches 10:33 AM 07-19-2016
A buddy of mine was wanting a few shots of him deadlifting for his IG and YouTube accounts ... he wanted them to be kinda raw feeling, thus the heavy edits ... the lighting was difficult lol
[Reply]
shark 05:06 AM 07-20-2016
shark 03:26 PM 07-21-2016
