Arturo Fuente 85 36.48%

Padrón 148 63.52%

Fuente for me.

Padrons are good, but the Fuentes are even better.
[Reply]

Padron, but I haven't tried too many Fuentes
[Reply]

:-) Haven't met a Fuente yet I didn't like.
[Reply]

Always happy to help :-)
[Reply]

Here is the special characters list http://www.tedmontgomery.com/tutorial/altchrc.html
[Reply]

╙
ó
Padrón
[Reply]

So far, Padron over Fuente, 10-5!:-)
[Reply]

I guess i'd have to go Fuente. They have a broader range of selections as far as I'm concerned.
[Reply]

I...am so....proud. (sniff...sniff)
[Reply]

when you're proud you :-)?
[Reply]

It's not my fault...it just happens!:-)
[Reply]

I'd go Fuente. There are very few that I don't like. I rarely get a bad Padrón, either, but have much more experience with the Fuente line.

There are really no losers in either brand, though.
[Reply]

I like the lower end Padrons more than the lower end Fuentes but I like the higher end Fuentes more than the higher end Padrons.

Confused?


Padron 2000 > AF Curlyhead

Hemmingway > Padron 40th

Opus > Padron 80th
[Reply]

that is insanely high end
[Reply]

I thought the 80th PAMs are pretty close to the Opus price-wise? :-)
[Reply]

I see I think you are referring to the 1964 and 1926?
[Reply]

Yes, that's what I meant.
[Reply]

Those are two of my favorites!! Too damn expensive though.
[Reply]

like I posted earlier the 1964 was cheaper then the Don Carlos
[Reply]

I'll take a Fuente over a Padron
[Reply]