I had the same thought. I think the character's name is Charlie.
[Reply]

Charlie...that's right! Error you think, or are they calling the audience stupid and just plopping him back in?!
[Reply]

I'm not sure why they did it but they have to know the fans are not stupid.
[Reply]

Are you guys talking about Monday? The ep last week was a repeat of the one with the guy from the alternate universe who had implanted Walter's memories in other people.
There was a new ep Monday (which we missed because Two And a Half Men and Big Bang Theory were also new) and a new one last night.
Posted via Mobile Device
[Reply]

Yep. The Monday episode was, to the best of my knowledge, new. And Charlie was in it. Very strange. Of course, strange is what Fringe is all about.
[Reply]

According to Zap2It, it was an unaired season 1 ep. And Abrams said Fringe would be less confusing than Lost... :-)
Posted via Mobile Device
[Reply]

It would have helped us had they mentioned that at the beginning or something!

The whole time we're like, what is this? Some alternate universe / time jump?!
[Reply]

TBH, it should have been pretty easy for the viewers to realize it was just an unaired episode from when Charlei was still alive...I watch it...it's great...twilight zone and x-files all wrapped up in one...:-)
[Reply]

This is a great show, it's not redundant like I thought.
[Reply]

Is it just me, or does it seem like there's less emphasis on "the Pattern" this season?
Posted via Mobile Device
[Reply]

IMDB Goofs set me up for this one: So was I the only one to notice the "misspelling" of Manhatan at the beginning of last night's episode. It seemed kind of strange for a series where the smallest detail can wind up a major plot point. As soon as they showed the merged guy, I realized I'd been had.
Posted via Mobile Device
[Reply]

John Noble should definetly get an Emmy.
[Reply]

This is a great show. I just got caught up and am on schedule for the 4/1 return.

I am really curious how Olivia is going to handle finding out Peter is from the alternate universe. It was fairly certain to me early on this was the case because Walter mentioned before "He's already died once" or something like that.

I don't think Olivia is going to make a big deal about it or anything. I mean, it's not like he's been a problem.

Thoughts?
[Reply]

With my amazing grasp of the obvious, I figured out what was going to happen almost a full minute in advance... :-)
It seemed strange to me that Walter didn't see that coming. Was that supposed to be a by-product of his general eccentricity?
Also, I honestly can't remember, did we ever find out what happened to the alternate Dunham? Did she have a goatee?
Posted via Mobile Device
[Reply]

I do not believe that we did.

Does anyone else get the feeling that Olivia and Peter were together in the alternate universe? Walter keeps making a lot of comments about the two of them becoming an item.
[Reply]

I'm thinking the other Dunham must be dead, or "our" Dunham would have ended up like the merged guy in the last episode, when she met Bell.

Didn't Walter fetch the other Peter right after "our" Peter died? So he would've been 7 or 8, kinda young to be dating...
Posted via Mobile Device
[Reply]

My wife and I love this show. It reminds me of X-Files in a way.
[Reply]

That is correct, according to previous episodes.

Haven't seen the latest yet, and this is not helping! Maybe in the morning, while everyone else is sleeping in.....
[Reply]

You're right, I should have thought about that.
[Reply]

Forgot to add a smiley on the end of my last post, sounds kinda prickish without. Sorry.
We don't know enough yet about the rules between the two universes, so I could be wrong about the other Dunham.
Posted via Mobile Device
[Reply]