chippewastud79 09:19 PM 07-27-2011
Originally Posted by kelmac07:
My Mets are giving it to the Reds again this evening. And Pelfrey sucks!! :-)
If beating the Reds is defining the season for the Mets, it is a sad state of affairs. The Reds are not a good baseball team, although some would lead you to believe they are.
:-)
Pelfrey had as many hits as the Reds LEADOFF hitter tonight, probably because he should be in Louisville not Cincinnati. I did like the Reds broadcast team saying he should watch Reyes if he wants to TRY to be a leadoff hitter because he certainly isn't one right now.
:-)
[Reply]
Starscream 03:32 PM 07-28-2011
Swept for the first time at home since '08. This team is pathetic. How does a team with this kind of talent just flat out suck?
[Reply]
smitdavi 06:30 PM 07-28-2011
Atleast Votto seems to be in quite the groove right now. Think that's 3 games in a row with a HR. If they are wanting to unload Alonso before the trade deadline they aren't doing a good job of showcasing him before Sunday. I have a hard time believing they just brought him up to ride the pine?!
[Reply]
kelmac07 06:53 PM 07-28-2011
I'm happy when my Mets beat anyone...let alone sweep someone at their home park.
:-)
[Reply]
chippewastud79 08:46 PM 07-28-2011
Originally Posted by Starscream:
Swept for the first time at home since '08. This team is pathetic. How does a team with this kind of talent just flat out suck?
Talent. Now thats funny. There are about 5 players on their roster that would be considered a talent. Votto, Phillips, Cueto, Cordero and Rolen are about the only 5 this team couldn't really do without. No one in their outfield couldn't be upgraded. SS was a bad group before Cozart came up and is once again a liability. Catcher is a toss up, unless you could put the two of them together. Their rotation is suspect at best, 2 of them wouldn't be 5's on most rosters in the MLB.
:-)
They got very lucky to win the division last year by beating terrible teams and playing the weakest schedule in baseball. Hell they won something like 25 games on the last out of the game. They were over-achievers and got run out of the playoffs. This year is just a continuation of last year with tougher competition.
:-)
[Reply]
Starscream 01:41 PM 07-29-2011
Originally Posted by chippewastud79:
Talent. Now thats funny. There are about 5 players on their roster that would be considered a talent. Votto, Phillips, Cueto, Cordero and Rolen are about the only 5 this team couldn't really do without. No one in their outfield couldn't be upgraded. SS was a bad group before Cozart came up and is once again a liability. Catcher is a toss up, unless you could put the two of them together. Their rotation is suspect at best, 2 of them wouldn't be 5's on most rosters in the MLB. :-)
They got very lucky to win the division last year by beating terrible teams and playing the weakest schedule in baseball. Hell they won something like 25 games on the last out of the game. They were over-achievers and got run out of the playoffs. This year is just a continuation of last year with tougher competition. :-)
Rolen and Cordero shoudln't be on the talent list anymore.
:-)
Maybe I should have said potential rather than talent. We have all these players with potential, but they just don't live up to it.
[Reply]
chippewastud79 01:46 PM 07-29-2011
Originally Posted by Starscream:
Maybe I should have said potential rather than talent. We have all these players with potential, but they just don't live up to it.
By potential, I think you mean media driven hype.
:-)
[Reply]
Starscream 02:17 PM 07-29-2011
Trivia question for the day. What is Stubbs' average this season on 0-2 counts?
Answer:
.000
:-)
[Reply]
chippewastud79 06:07 PM 07-29-2011
Originally Posted by Starscream:
Trivia question for the day. What is Stubbs' average this season on 0-2 counts?
Answer:
.000
:-)
What's his K percentage? 98%?
:-)
:-)
[Reply]
Starscream 08:07 PM 07-29-2011
Originally Posted by chippewastud79:
What's his K percentage? 98%? :-):-)
28 of 33 were Ks.
How about strikeouts vs. strikeouts looking on an 0-2 count?
:-)
[Reply]
chippewastud79 09:34 PM 07-29-2011
Originally Posted by Starscream:
28 of 33 were Ks.
How about strikeouts vs. strikeouts looking on an 0-2 count?:-)
He is 0-2 tonight with an 0-2 count, only 1 K though.
:-)
[Reply]
elderboy02 09:36 PM 07-29-2011
jsnake 09:37 PM 07-29-2011
Where do Royals fans go? I mean seriously we suck so bad we don't have our own thread. Being a Kansas City sports fan is tough.
[Reply]
elderboy02 09:38 PM 07-29-2011
Originally Posted by jsnake:
Where do Royals fans go? I mean seriously we suck so bad we don't have our own thread. Being a Kansas City sports fan is tough.
Try being a Cincinnati fan. No world series wins since '90 and no super bowl wins either
:-)
[Reply]
KidRock 10:46 PM 07-29-2011
posting while severly **** faced (pwssf) tigers fan! go reds!
:-)
:-) see you clowns at shaaackkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
[Reply]
chippewastud79 05:55 AM 07-30-2011
Originally Posted by KidRock:
posting while severly **** faced (pwssf) tigers fan! go reds! :-) :-) see you clowns at shaaackkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkkk
That typing is way too good for being **** faced. You should have drank a few more Jon.
:-)
[Reply]
chippewastud79 05:56 AM 07-30-2011
Stubbs is 1 for 6 and the Reds win! What a surprise
:-)
[Reply]
KidRock 07:34 AM 07-30-2011
Originally Posted by chippewastud79:
That typing is way too good for being **** faced. You should have drank a few more Jon. :-)
I had a lot to drink, however you should see some of the text messages I sent out last night, lol.
[Reply]
jsnake 07:58 AM 07-30-2011
Originally Posted by elderboy02:
Try being a Cincinnati fan. No world series wins since '90 and no super bowl wins either :-)
You got me there. Of course all our championships were before my fan days.
[Reply]
Starscream 10:38 PM 07-30-2011
Win 2, lose 4, win 2.
Looks like Jocketty had no interest in making trades this year. Guess we're gonna have to ride it out. No matter how good a player may have been if we had made a trade, it wouldn't make a difference anyway with this team. At least Gomes is gone.
[Reply]