Ok, yesterday sucked so I burnt a cigar to relax.  I have both a cold and bronchitis so the taste buds are off big time.
 
Oliva O Ole Maduro 4 3/4 x 50 (silk band) all Nicuraguan
 
The Pre draw was spot on for me.  Not plugged but decent resistance, I hate a loose draw.  Pre burn aroma....  can't say....  It lit up very easy and the burn from start to finish was outstanding.  The robusto is my favorite size, a bit over an hour to smoke.  Speaking of smoke this stick produces a ton.  I had to make an effort not to overly smoke up the bar.  Not just a lot but also thick.  Got comments from others there that it smelled good.
 
The first 1/4" almost disappointed.  Started out with a bit of peppery spice that I wasn't looking for based on the red I smoked.  Initial flaver was very woodsey and reminded my of burning logs outside.  A smell I like.  After the first 1/4" the spice totally faded, yea!  It settled into a thick rich smoke.  The woodsey sense stayed the full distance.  It very thick and rich tasting, itsnorkled through the nose with no bite at all.  Very low in nic as I did this before supper with no noticeable buzz.  It would make a very good early morning cigar for some.  
 
I'm sure other flavors were there but with a cold I just don't know.  Prolly a bit of a waste to smoke it but I needed it.  Gonna reserve how it comperes to a Omni red but it stands up well enough on it's own.  Out of the ole 1 - 5 scale, at least a 4 maybe 4.5.
		
		
[Reply]
Originally Posted by stearns:
wow, with everything i've heard about this cigar, 'early morning' has never been associated. very interesting... thanks for the review
 
stearns
I could see this with a heavy type, non-sweet breakfast.  Western omlete (with maybe a nice smoked cheese in it) and coffee would fair well.  A sweet say pancakes and syrup not so much.  Too much contrast.
		
		
[Reply]
alright... get me a detailed list of the ideal breakfast to compliment it (since you seem to have a good flavor profile in mind), bring the cigars, i'll see ya sunday morning 
:-)
stearns
		
		
[Reply]